The Impact of Omitting Contralateral Systematic Biopsy on the Surgical Planning of Patients with a Unilateral Suspicious Lesion on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Undergoing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.

Background and objective: A combined approach of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) and bilateral systematic biopsy (SBx) is advised in patients who have an increased risk of prostate cancer (PCa). The diagnostic gain of SBx in detecting PCa for treatment planning of patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is unknown. This study aims to determine the impact of omitting contralateral SBx on the surgical planning of patients undergoing RARP in terms of nerve-sparing surgery (NSS) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). Methods: Case files from 80 men with biopsy-proven PCa were studied. All men had a unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI, and underwent TBx and bilateral SBx. Case files were presented to five urologists for the surgical planning of RARP. Each case file was presented randomly using two different sets of information: (1) results of TBx + bilateral SBx, and (2) results of TBx + ipsilateral SBx. The urologists assessed whether they would perform NSS and/or ePLND. Key findings and limitations: A change in the surgical plan concerning NSS on the contralateral side was observed in 9.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4-12.2) of cases. Additionally, the indication for ePLND changed in 5.3% (95% CI 3.3-7.9) of cases. Interobserver agreement based on Fleiss' kappa changed from 0.44 to 0.15 for the indication of NSS and from 0.84 to 0.83 for the indication of ePLND. Conclusions and clinical implications: In our series, the diagnostic information obtained from contralateral SBx has limited impact on the surgical planning of patients with a unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI scheduled to undergo RARP. Patient summary: In patients with one-sided prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging, omitting biopsies on the other side rarely changed the surgical plan with respect to nerve-sparing surgery and the indication to perform extended lymph node dissection.

Extended pelvic lymph node dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is an independent risk factor for major complications.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the major postoperative complication rate after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to identify related risk factors. A consecutive series of patients who underwent RARP between September 2016 and May 2021, with or without extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) were analyzed for postoperative complications that occurred within 30 days following surgery. Potential risk factors related to complications were identified by means of a multivariate logistic analysis. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for the occurrence of major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) on a per patient level. A multivariate logistic regression with risk factors was performed to identify contributors to complications. In total, 1280 patients were included, of whom 79 (6.2%) experienced at least 1 major complication. Concomitant ePLND was performed in 609 (48%) of patients. The majority of all complications were likely related to the surgical procedure, with anastomotic leakage and lymphoceles being the most common. Upon multivariate analysis, performing ePLND remained the only significant risk factor for the occurrence of major complications (OR 2.26, p = 0.001). In contrast to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy alone, the combination with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) has a substantial risk of serious complications. Since the ePLND is performed mainly for staging purpose, the clinical contribution of the ePLND has to be reconsidered with the present use of the PSMA-PET/CT.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Radioguided Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients with a Suspicion of Locoregional Lymph Node Metastases: The DETECT Trial.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioguided surgery (RGS) aims to optimize the peroperative detection and removal of PSMA-avid lymph node (LN) metastases (LNMs) and has been described in patients with recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). In newly diagnosed PCa patients undergoing pelvic LN dissections, PSMA RGS could guide the urologist toward PSMA-expressing LNMs as identified on preoperative 18F-PSMA PET/CT imaging. The objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of 111In-PSMA RGS in primary PCa patients with one or more suggestive LNs on preoperative 18F-PSMA PET/CT. Methods: This prospective, phase I/II study included 20 newly diagnosed PCa patients with at least 1 suggestive LN on preoperative 18F-PSMA PET/CT. PSMA RGS was performed 24 h after 111In-PSMA-I&T administration, and postoperative 18F-PSMA PET/CT was performed to verify successful removal of the suggestive lesions. The primary endpoint was determination of the safety and feasibility of 111In-PSMA RGS. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events. Feasibility was described as the possibility to peroperatively detect suggestive LNs as identified on preoperative imaging. Secondary outcomes included the accuracy of 111In-PSMA RGS compared with histopathology, tumor- and lesion-to-background ratios, and biochemical recurrence. Results: No tracer-related adverse events were reported. In 20 patients, 43 of 49 (88%) 18F-PSMA PET-suggestive lesions were successfully removed. 111In-PSMA RGS facilitated peroperative identification and resection of 29 of 49 (59%) RGS-target lesions, of which 28 (97%) contained LNMs. Another 14 of 49 (29%) resected LNs were not detected with 111In-PSMA RGS, of which 2 contained metastases. Conclusion: 111In-PSMA RGS is a safe and feasible procedure that allows peroperative detection of 18F-PSMA PET/CT-suggestive lesions in newly diagnosed PCa patients. The use of a radioactive PSMA tracer and a detection device (γ-probe) during surgery helps in identifying LNs that were suggestive of PCa metastases on the 18F-PSMA PET/CT before surgery and thus may improve the peroperative identification and removal of these LNs.

Validation of Claims Data for Absorbing Pads as a Measure for Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy, a National Cross-Sectional Analysis.

The use of healthcare insurance claims data for urinary incontinence (UI) pads has the potential to serve as an objective measure for assessing post-radical prostatectomy UI rates, but its validity for this purpose has not been established. The aim of this study is to correlate claims data with Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for UI pad use. Patients who underwent RP in the Netherlands between September 2019 and February 2020 were included. Incontinence was defined as the daily use of ≥1 pad(s). Claims data for UI pads at 12-15 months after RP were extracted from a nationwide healthcare insurance database in the Netherlands. Participating hospitals provided PROMS data. In total, 1624 patients underwent RP. Corresponding data of 845 patients was provided by nine participating hospitals, of which 416 patients were matched with complete PROMs data. Claims data and PROMs showed 31% and 45% post-RP UI (≥1 pads). UI according to claims data compared with PROMs had a sensitivity of 62%, specificity of 96%, PPV of 92%, NPV of 75% and accuracy of 81%. The agreement between both methods was moderate (κ = 0.60). Claims data for pads moderately align with PROMs in assessing post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence and could be considered as a conservative quality indicator.

Confocal laser microscopy for assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of confocal laser microscopy (CLM) for intraoperative margin assessment as faster alternative to neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Surgical margins were assessed during 50 RARP procedures in patients scheduled for NeuroSAFE. Posterolateral sections were cut and imaged with CLM and further processed to conform with the NeuroSAFE protocol. Secondary resection (SR) was performed in case a positive surgical margin (PSM) was observed with NeuroSAFE. Afterwards, the CLM images were non-blinded assessed for the presence of PSMs. The accuracy of both NeuroSAFE and CLM was compared with conventional histopathology. Agreement for detection of PSMs between NeuroSAFE and CLM was evaluated with Cohen's kappa coefficient. Procedure times were compared with a Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. RESULTS: In total, 96 posterolateral sections of RP specimens were evaluated for the presence of PSMs. CLM identified 15 (16%) PSMs and NeuroSAFE identified 14 (15%) PSMs. CLM had a calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 86%, 96%, 80% and 98% respectively for the detection of PSMs compared to definite pathology. After SR, residual tumour was found in six of 13 cases (46%), which were all identified by both techniques. There was a substantial level of agreement between CLM and NeuroSAFE (κ = 0.80). The median procedure time for CLM was significantly shorter compared to NeuroSAFE (8 vs 50 min, P < 0.001). The main limitation of this study was the non-blinded assessment of the CLM images. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to NeuroSAFE, CLM is a promising technique for intraoperative margin assessment and is able to reduce the time of intraoperative margin assessment.

Reassessment of Prostate Biopsy Specimens for Patients Referred for Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Rarely Influences Surgical Planning.

BACKGROUND: The minimum volume standard is 100 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) procedures per hospital in the Netherlands, so patients have to be referred to high-volume surgical centers for RARP. During preoperative work-up, prostate biopsies taken elsewhere are reassessed, with upgrading or downgrading of the initial Gleason grade group a possible consequence. OBJECTIVE: To determine if prostate biopsy reassessment leads to adjustment of the surgical plan regarding a nerve-sparing approach and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) during RARP. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: For 125 men who were referred to the Prosper prostate center at Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital (CWH) in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2016, results for the initial assessment of prostate biopsy by a local uropathologist were compared to results for biopsy reassessment by dedicated uropathologists at CWH. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The pathologists reached agreement in 80% of the cases. In cases for which there was disagreement (n = 25), biopsy revision involved upgrading of the initial grade group in 68% and downgrading in 32%. Biopsy reassessment led to a change in surgical plan in ten cases (8%). As a result of upgrading, ePLND was performed in three patients (2%). ePLND was omitted in one patient (1%) because of downgrading. For three patients (2%) a non-nerve-sparing procedure was planned after upgrading of the initial grade group. For four patients (3%), a unilateral nerve-sparing procedure was performed after downgrading. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there is large interobserver agreement between uropathologists in the assessment of Gleason grade group in prostate biopsy specimens. Reassessment rarely leads to a change in surgical plan regarding the indication for a nerve-sparing approach and ePLND. Therefore, reassessment of prostate biopsy before radical prostatectomy can be omitted when the initial pathological assessment was performed by a dedicated uropathologist. PATIENT SUMMARY: Reassessment of the initial prostate biopsy specimen for patients referred to a specialist center for robot-assisted removal of the prostate rarely influences surgical planning and can be omitted.

Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT in primary lymph node staging of prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: To determine preoperative diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT-scan in detection (or exclusion) of lymph node metastases (LNM) in men with prostate cancer (PCa) in comparison to the histopathological results of the extended pelvic lymph node dissection (e-PLND). METHODS: A retrospective medical records-based cohort study, including 47 men with primary PCa who received 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT and subsequent e-PLND for lymph node staging. Incidence and number of visualized LNM, their locations and diameters on 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT were recorded in comparison to the histopathological results of the e-PLND as reference. Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT were calculated on the basis of histopathology results after e-PLND. RESULTS: Forty-seven men were eligible for analysis. Median lymph node yield was 19 (range 10-70). A total of 996 lymph nodes were removed, and 59 metastases were found in 21 cases (45%). Preoperative PET was issued 'positive' in 11 men and in 9 of them (82%) this was histopathologically confirmed resulting in a PPV of 82% (95% CI, 51-96). On the contrary, PET was issued 'negative' in 36 cases, but in 12 of them (33%) metastases were detected in the e-PLND specimen, resulting in an NPV of 67% (95% CI, 50-80). The patient-based sensitivity was 43% (95% CI, 24-64) and the patient-based specificity rate was 92% (95% CI, 75-99), whereas overall diagnostic accuracy was established to be 70% in the present cohort. CONCLUSION: 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT has a high specificity and positive predicted value for the presence of LNM in men with prostate cancer. However, the sensitivity and NPV seem to be limited to exclude the absence of LNM at a clinically acceptable level. Prospective evaluation is necessary to define patients who may benefit from 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT as a triage test for the indication for e-PLND.

Penile intraepithelial neoplasia: Nomenclature, incidence and progression to malignancy in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of penile intraepithelial neoplasia in the Netherlands using a nationwide histopathology registry and to discuss the nomenclature of premalignant penile lesions. METHODS: Data from patients in the Netherlands diagnosed with a premalignant penile lesion between January 1998 and December 2007 were collected from the nationwide histopathology registry (PALGA); this database covers all pathology reports of inhabitants in the Netherlands. The premalignant lesions included were erythroplasia of Queyrat; Bowen's disease; bowenoid papulosis; mild, moderate and severe dysplasia; and carcinoma in situ of the penis. The terminology used in the pathological reports was translated to penile intraepithelial neoplasia. The grading was made analogous to that of vulvar premalignant lesions. RESULTS: The PALGA database enrolled 380 patients with premalignant penile lesions. Severe premalignant lesions, penile intraepithelial neoplasia III, were found in 254 patients (67%), penile intraepithelial neoplasia II in 84 (22%) and penile intraepithelial neoplasia I in 42 patients (11%). Most lesions were located on the prepuce (45%), followed by glans (38%) and shaft (3%). The median age of patients with penile intraepithelial neoplasia was 58 years. Progression to malignant disease occurred (2% for penile intraepithelial neoplasia I vs 7% for penile intraepithelial neoplasia III) in 26 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Penile intraepithelial neoplasia is a rarely diagnosed condition. Because of the wide variation of terms used for premalignant intraepithelial neoplasia of the penis, we recommend restricting this nomenclature to penile intraepithelial neoplasia.

A 10-year follow-up after transurethral resection of the prostate, contact laser prostatectomy and electrovaporization in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia; long-term results of a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term results of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), contact laser prostatectomy (CLP) and electrovaporization of the prostate (EVAP) in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2001, a prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted in 150 men with LUTS suggestive of BPH, who had a prostate volume of 20-65 mL and a Schäfer's obstruction grade of > or =2. Outcome variables were the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Quality of Life (QoL) question, Symptom Problem Index (SPI), BPH Impact Index (BII), maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)), prostate volume, prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, morbidity and mortality. In 2008 we carried out a long-term follow-up in these patients. Long-term values were compared with preoperative values for each treatment group (Wilcoxon signed-rank test), differences among groups were analysed (Kruskal-Wallis test) and actuarial failure-rates of the interventions were determined (Kaplan-Meier analysis). RESULTS: Although we could account for 91% of the initial participants in 2008, 66 (44%) patients (29 TURP, 20 CLP and 17 EVAP) were available for follow-up measurements after a mean (range) of 10.1(6.9-12.7) years Among the three treatment groups, there were no significant differences in IPSS, QoL, SPI, BII, Q(max), PSA level and prostate volume. The IPSS, QoL, SPI and BII were still improved (P < 0.05) from values before treatment for all treatments. Only in the TURP group were the long-term results of Q(max) still improved (P < 0.05). The mortality rate was comparable among the treatments. The 10-year actuarial failure rates (95% confidence interval) were 0.11 (0.03-0.20), 0.22 (0.10-0.35) and 0.23 (0.11-0.35) for TURP, CLP and EVAP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After a mean follow-up of 10.1 years, there were similar and durable improvements in IPSS, QoL, SPI and BII for patients with LUTS suggestive of BPH after TURP, CLP and EVAP. Between the treatment groups there were no statistically significant differences in Q(max), PSA levels and prostate volume at any time during the follow-up. However, only patients treated with TURP showed minimal durable improvements in Q(max). There was no statistically significant difference in success rate and mortality rate among the three treatments.

[Urological symptoms due to rectus sheath haematoma]. / Urologische symptomen bij het rectusschedehematoom.

Two men presented at the Accident & Emergency Department with lower urinary tract symptoms. The first patient was a 76-year-old male with reddish urine and lower abdominal pain. A CT-scan revealed a tumorous mass related to the bladder. The second patient was a 61-year-old male with dysuria and lower abdominal pain. In both patients the complaints were due to a rectus sheath haematoma. Rectus sheath haematoma is a rare condition caused by damage of the epigastric vessels or a rupture of the rectus abdominis muscle. Voiding problems can arise when the haematoma extends into the prevesical (Retzius) space that is anatomically related to the rectus sheath. A haematoma of the rectus sheath is difficult to diagnose. Current insights show that conservative treatment is generally sufficient.